Article Sidebar

PDF
Date Published: 26/02/2020
Online Published: 26/02/2020
Abstract Views: 1489
Views PDF: 818
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54607/hcmue.js.17.2.2604(2020)
Issue
Vol. 17 No. 2 (2020)
Section
Articles
How to Cite
Lê , H. M. N., & Nguyễn , T. M. T. (2020). STEM-EDUCATION: SIMPLE AUTOMATIC WATER-SUPPLING SYSTEM BASED ON THE 6E LEARNING MODEL FOR SECONDARY STUDENTS. HCMUE Journal of Science, 17(2), 254. https://doi.org/10.54607/hcmue.js.17.2.2604(2020)

STEM-EDUCATION: SIMPLE AUTOMATIC WATER-SUPPLING SYSTEM BASED ON THE 6E LEARNING MODEL FOR SECONDARY STUDENTS

Hải Mỹ Ngân Lê , Thị Minh Thảo Nguyễn

Main Article Content

Abstract

 

STEM education is a learning approach which is encouraged to be implemeted in the current Vietnamese general education curriculum. A STEM topic will haveimpacts on students only when it is linked to local practices and meaningful for human life. One of aspects that is practical and attracts public attention is Robotics. This article presents a STEM topic in the field, which is a simple automated water supply system. The topic is designed based on the 6E teaching model, a model that emphasizes technical design elements in STEM-oriented teaching.

 

stem-education: simple AUTOMATIC WATER-SUPPLing SYSTEM based
on the 6E learning model for secondary students

Le Hai My Ngan*, Nguyen Thi Minh Thao

Ho Chi Minh City University of Education

*Corresponding author: Le Hai My Ngan – Email: nganlhm@hcmue.edu.vn

Received: November 26, 2019; Revised: December 13, 2019; Accepted: February 11, 2020

 

ABSTRACT

STEM education is a learning approach which is encouraged to be implemeted in the current Vietnamese general education curriculum. A STEM topic will haveimpacts on students only when it is linked to local practices and meaningful for human life. One of aspects that is practical and attracts public attention is Robotics. This article presents a STEM topic in the field, which is a simple automated water supply system. The topic is designed based on the 6E teaching model, a model that emphasizes technical design elements in STEM-oriented teaching.

Keywords:6E learning by Design Model; STEM education; educational robotics;
secondary school

 

Keywords

6E learning by Design Model, STEM education, educational robotics, secondary school

Article Details

References

Alimisis, D. (2010). Introducing robotics in schools: post-TERECoP experiences from a pilot educational program. Paper presented at the Proceedings of Intl. Conf. on Simulation, Modeling and Programming for Autonomous Robots (SIMPAR 2010) Workshops.
Alimisis, D. (2012). Robotics in education & education in robotics: Shifting focus from technology to pedagogy. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Robotics in Education.
Alimisis, D., & Kynigos, C. (2009). Constructionism and robotics in education Teacher education on robotic-enhanced constructivist pedagogical methods, 11-26.
Benitti, F. (2012). Exploring the educational potential of robotics in schools: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 58(3), 978-988.
Blikstein, P. (2013). Digital fabrication and ‘making’in education: The democratization of invention. FabLabs: Of machines, makers and inventors, 4, 1-21.
Burke, B. N., D.T.E. (2014). THE ITEEA 6E learning byDeSIGN(TM) model MAXIMIZING INFORMED DESIGN AND INQUIRY IN THE INTEGRATIVE STEM CLASSROOM. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 73(6), 14-19.
Bybee, R. W., Taylor, J. A., Gardner, A., Van Scotter, P., Powell, J. C., Westbrook, A., & Landes, N. (2006). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Origins and effectiveness. Colorado Springs, Co: BSCS, 5, 88-98.
Christensen, R., & Knezek, G. (2017). Relationship of middle school student STEM interest to career intent. Journal of Education in Science & Environment and Health, 3(1), 1-13.
Chung, C.-C., Lin, C.-L., & Lou, S.-J. (2018). Analysis of the learning effectiveness of the STEAM-6E special course—A case study about the creative design of IoT assistant devices for the elderly. Sustainability, 10(9), 3040.
Eguchi, A. (2014). Why Robotics in Education?-Robotics as a Learning Tool for Educational Revolution. Paper presented at the Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference.
Jung, S., & Won, E. S. (2018). Systematic review of research trends in robotics education for young children. Sustainability, 10(4), 905.
Kim, C., Kim, D., Yuan, J., Hill, R. B., Doshi, P., Thai, C. N., & Education. (2015). Robotics to promote elementary education pre-service teachers' STEM engagement, learning, and teaching. Computers & Education, 91, 14-31.
Komis, V., Romero, M., & Misirli, A. (2016). A scenario-based approach for designing educational robotics activities for co-creative problem solving. Paper presented at the International Conference EduRobotics 2016.
Ministry of Education and Training. (2018). General education curriculum.
Mohr‐Schroeder, M. J., Jackson, C., Miller, M., Walcott, B., Little, D. L., Speler, L., . . . Schroeder, D. C. (2014). Developing Middle School Students' Interests in STEM via Summer Learning Experiences: S ee B lue STEM C amp. School Science and Mathematics, 114(6), 291-301.
Next Generation Science Standards. Retrieved from https://www.nextgenscience.org/
Nguyen, T. N. (2017). Design and organize STEM education topics for middle and high school students: HCMC University of Education.
Nourbakhsh, I. R., Hamner, E., Crowley, K., & Wilkinson, K. (2004). Formal measures of learning in a secondary school mobile robotics course. Paper presented at the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004. Proceedings. ICRA'04. 2004.
ROBOTIQ. (2017). What's the Difference Between Robotics and Artificial Intelligence? Retrieved from http://blog.robotiq.com/whats-the-difference-between-robotics-and-artificial-intelligence
What Is Robotics? (2009). Retrieved from https://www.nasa.gov/audience/forstudents/5-8/features/nasa-knows/what_is_robotics_58.html