Article Sidebar

PDF
Date Published: 27/08/2021
Online Published: 31/08/2021
Abstract Views: 879
Views PDF: 627
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54607/hcmue.js.18.8.3022(2021)
Issue
Vol. 18 No. 8 (2021)
Section
Education Science
How to Cite
Đặng , Đ. P., Vũ , Q. T., Nguyễn , Đ. A., & Lê , H. M. N. (2021). STEM EDUCATION: SIMPLE ROBOT VACUUM CLEANER BASED ON THE ENGINEERING DESIGN PROCESS FOR SECONDARY STUDENTS. HCMUE Journal of Science, 18(8), 1495. https://doi.org/10.54607/hcmue.js.18.8.3022(2021)

STEM EDUCATION: SIMPLE ROBOT VACUUM CLEANER BASED ON THE ENGINEERING DESIGN PROCESS FOR SECONDARY STUDENTS

Đông Phương Đặng , Quốc Thắng Vũ , Đức Anh Nguyễn , Hải Mỹ Ngân Lê

Main Article Content

Abstract

 

 

            STEM education is an integrated teaching perspective in which students expericence, learn, explore and research practical problems. In STEM education content, robotics is a modern field that has been concerned in many research projects because of the positive impact on student’s interest, thinking and abilities. This article presents a STEM robotics topic for 8th graders– robot vacuum cleaner. This topic is designed based on the engineering design process to enhance design thinking and problem-solving skills. Experimental results for 8th graders illustrate that they can access and accquire knowledge as well as show positive expression of problem-solving abilities in STEM robotics through this topic.

 

 

Keywords

educational robotics, EDP, secondary school, STEM education

Article Details

References

Arís, N., & Orcos, L. (2019a). Educational Robotics in the Stage of Secondary Education: Empirical Study on Motivation and STEM Skills. Education Sciences, 9(2), 73. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9020073
Arís, N., & Orcos, L. (2019b). Educational Robotics in the Stage of Secondary Education: Empirical Study on Motivation and STEM Skills. Education Sciences, 9(2), 73. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9020073
Atmatzidou. (2012). Evaluating the Role of Collaboration Scripts as Group Guiding Tools in Activities of Educational Robotics: Conclusions from Three Case Studies. Proceedings of the 12th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, 298–302.
Catlin, D., & Woollard, J. (2014). Educational Robots and Computational Thinking.
Chen, Y., & Chang, C. C. (2018). The impact of an integrated robotics STEM course with a sailboat topic on high school students’ perceptions of integrative STEM, interest, and career orientation. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/94314
Crismond, D. (2013). Design practices and misconceptions: Helping beginners in engineering design, 80(1), 50-54.
Eguchi, A. (2010). What is Educational Robotics? Theories behind it and practical implementation.
Erkan Çalişkan. (2020). The effects of robotics programming on secondary school students’ problem-solving skills. World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues, 12(4), 217-230.
Jung, S., & Won, E. (2018). Systematic review of research trends in robotics education for young children. Sustainability, 10(4), 905.
Ministry of Education and Training. (2018). Chuong trinh giao duc pho thong tong the [General Education Curriculum]. Hanoi.
Miwa A. Takeuchi, Pratim Sengupta, Marie-Claire Shanahan, J. D. A. & M. H. (2020). Transdisciplinarity in STEM education: a critical review. Studies in Science Education.
Mohr-Schroeder, M. J., Jackson, C., Miller, M., Walcott, B., Little, D. L., Speler, L., … Schroeder, D. C. (2014). Developing Middle School Students’ Interests in STEM via Summer Learning Experiences: See Blue STEM Camp. School Science and Mathematics, 114(6), 291-301. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12079
Mubin, O., Stevens, C., Shahid, S., Mahmud, A., & Dong, J.-J. (2013). A review of the applicability of robots in education. Technology for Education and Learning, 1. https://doi.org/10.2316/Journal.209.2013.1.209-0015
Le, H. M. N., & Nguyen, V. B. (2020). Xay dung khung nang luc giai quyet van de trong giao duc khoa hoc robot cua HS THCS [Designing a problem-solving competence framework in educational robotics for secondary school students]. HNUE Journal of Science, 65(7),
184-196. https://doi.org/10.18173/2354-1075.2020-0089
Le, H. M. N., Nguyen, T. T., Mai, T. K. N., Dang, D. P., & Vu, Q. T. (2020). Mot so yeu to anh huong hung thu doi voi linh vuc Robotics cua hoc sinh mot so truong THCS tai TP Ho Chi Minh [Factors affecting students’ interest in Robotics at some secondary schools – Ho Chi Minh City]. Ho Chi Minh City University of Education Journal of Science, 8, 1337-1350.
Numanoğlu, M., & Keser, H. (2017). Robot Usage in Programmıng Teachıng - Mbot Example. Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education, 6, 497-515. https://doi.org/10.14686/buefad.306198
Odorico, A. (2004). Marco teórico para una robótica pedagógica.
Saleiro, M., Carmo, B., Rodrigues, J. M. F., & Du Buf, J. M. H. (2013). A low-cost classroom-oriented educational robotics system. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics),
74-83. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02675-6_8