SOURCE DOMAIN OF HUMAN OF CONCEPTUAL METAPHORS IN VIETNAMESE AND AMERICAN ENGLISH POLITICAL DISCOURSE
Main Article Content
Abstract
Based on literature review of English discourse analysis, the article aims to further elaborate the research direction of conceptual metaphors in Vietnamese and American English political discourse by generalizing the implementation of a conceptual system based on the source domain of HUMAN. At the same time, it compares the concerned conceptual metaphor expressions in the political discourse of these two languages. The results show that many models share the same source and target domains, but the expression of conceptual metaphors is very different. There are also many cases that, despite having the same political target domain, the construction of metaphors according to the levels in the two discourse systems is different. And all in all, the more general the conceptual metaphors are, the more similar they are in the two languages. However, the difference often occurs in the linguistic metaphor system.
Keywords
concept, conceptual metaphor, human, political discourse, source domain
Article Details
References

Ho Chi Minh (2004). Ho Chi Minh toan tap, tap 4 [Complete works of Ho Chi Minh, vol.4]. National Political Publishing House.

Ho Chi Minh (2004). Ho Chi Minh toan tap, tap 5 [Complete works of Ho Chi Minh, vol.5]. National Political Publishing House.

Ho Chi Minh (2004). Ho Chi Minh toan tap, tap 7 [Complete works of Ho Chi Minh, vol.7]. National Political Publishing House.

Ho Chi Minh (2004). Ho Chi Minh toan tap, tap 12 [Complete works of Ho Chi Minh, vol.12]. National Political Publishing House.

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1989, 2003). Metaphors we live by. The University of Chicago Press.

Le, D. (1984). Nam vung quy luat, doi moi quan ly kinh te [Mastering the rules, innovating economic management]. Journal of People's Army, 336, 22.

Lucas, S. E., & Medhurst, M. J. (2009). Words of a Century: The top 100 American speeches, 1900-1999. Oxford University Press.

Nguyen, V. H., & Nguyen, H. A. (2016). Dan luan Ngon ngu hoc tri nhan [An Introduction to Cognitive linguistics]. Hanoi: Hanoi National University Press.

Nguyen, X. H. (2017). Ve mot huong nghien cuu dien ngon chinh tri tieng Viet [About a direction to study Vietnamese political discourse]. Ho Chi Minh University of Education Journal of Science, 14 (5), 77-83.

Nguyen, X. H. (2018). An du y niem trong dien ngon chinh tri tieng Viet va tieng Anh [Conceptual metaphor in English and Vietnamese political discourse]. Proceedings of the International Conference “Linguistic Issues in Vietnam and in SouthEast Asia”. Publishing House of VNU-HCM, 2019, 490-507.

Nguyen, X. H. (2019). Ve mot so mien y niem nguon trong dien ngon chinh tri tieng Viet [Conceptual source domains in Vienamese political discourse]. Journal of Language and Life, 8(288),

27-31.

Nguyen, X. H. (2020). Ve mot so mien nguon pho bien trong dien ngon chinh tri tieng Anh Mi [About some common source domains in American English political discourse]. Ho Chi Minh University of Education Journal of Science, 17(1), 101-106.

Pham, V. D. (1955). Pham Van Dong va Ngoai giao Viet Nam [Pham Van Dong and Viet Nam’s Diplomacy]. Ha Noi, 2006, 387.

Trinh, S. (2019). Cognitive Models and Culture Interaction in Thomas Engelbert (Editor) [Mo hinh tri nhan va tuong tac van hoa]. Vietnamese studies in Vietnam and Germany, New Contributions to Vietnamese linguistics. Publikationen Der Hambuger Vietnamistik, 207-300.

Trinh, S. (2013). Phong cach ngon ngu cua Chu tich Ho Chi Minh nhin tu goc do ngon ngu hoc tri nhan [Linguistic style of Ho Chi Minh from the perspective of cognitive linguistics]. Journal of Language and Life, 1+2 (207+208).

Trinh, S. (2016). An du y niem va nhung van de con lai [Conceptual metaphors and the rest issues]. Journal of Language and Life, 12(254), 1-5.

van Dijk T. A. (1997). What is Political Discourse Analysis? Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 11,

11-52.

Vestermark, I. (2007). Metaphors in Politics: A Study of the Metaphorical Personification of America in Politic Discourse. Lulea University of Technology.
