CONCEPTUAL METAPHORS OF THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT IN SOUTH KOREAN MEDIA DISCOURSE ON THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC

Seon Jong Kim, Thị Thanh Trúc Trần

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study examines the use of natural environment metaphors in South Korean media discourse about the COVID-19 pandemic. By analyzing 248 discourses from 59 newspapers between February 2020 and July 2022, the research explores how natural environment metaphors were employed to convey messages about the pandemic and response measures. Grounded in Conceptual Metaphor Theory and Framing Theory, the analysis reveals how these metaphors reflected South Korea's crisis management priorities and shaped public perceptions of COVID-19. The findings reveal that Korean media predominantly used four types of natural environment metaphors: brink (81%), mountain (13%), river (5%), and cave (1%). These metaphors served not only to describe the severity of the pandemic but also to mobilize public support and encourage collective action in addressing the health crisis. The study highlights the critical role of natural environment metaphors in shaping public understanding of the pandemic and influencing readers' behavioral responses. Furthermore, it underscores how these metaphors reflect policy priorities and South Korea's crisis management approach. These findings contribute to a deeper understanding of the interplay between metaphorical language, crisis communication, and public health management in the context of a global pandemic.

Article Details

References

Coombs, W. T. (1995). Choosing the right words: The development of guidelines for the selection of the “appropriate” crisis-response strategies. Management Communication Quarterly, 8(4), 447-476. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318995008004003
Cover, R. (2024). Identity in the COVID-19 years: Communication, crisis and ethics. Bloomsbury Academic.
Doquin de Saint Preux, A., & Masid Blanco, O. (2021). The power of conceptual metaphors in the age of pandemic: The influence of the WAR and SPORT domains on emotions and thoughts. Language & Communication, 81, 37-47.
Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51-58.
Gamson, W. A. (1992). Talking Politics. Cambridge University Press.
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. London: The University of Chicago.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. Basic Books.
Pragglejaz Group. (2007). MIP: A Method for Identifying Metaphorically Used Words in Discourse. Metaphor and Symbol. 22(1), 1-39.
Rajandran, K. (2020). 'A Long Battle Ahead': Malaysian and Singaporean Prime Ministers Employ War Metaphors for COVID-19. Gema Online Journal of Language Studies, 20, 261-267.
Takas, E., Iordanidou, S., & Jebril, N. (Eds.). (2023). Political discourse and media in times of crisis. Anthem Press.
Tran-Thi-Thanh, T. (2024). Analyzing war metaphors in the context of the COVID-19: A critical metaphor analysis. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 15(6), 1959-1966. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1506.21
Wicke, P., & Bolognesi, M. M. (2020) 'Framing COVID‑19: How We Conceptualize and Discuss the Pandemic on Twitter'. PLoS ONE. 15(9): e0240010.
김철규 (Kim, C. K.). (2021). 신문 사설의 코로나19 사태 관련 은유적 표현에 의한 부각과 은폐에 대한 연구 [A study on the highlighting and hiding caused by metaphorical expressions in newspaper editorials on the covid 19 pandemic]. Journal of Language Sciences, 28(2), 49-78.