APPLYING ANALOGICAL IN INTEGRATED TEACHING OF THE “LOCOMOTOR SYSTEM” UNIT IN NATURAL SCIENCES 8 TOWARDS TO DEVELOP STUDENTS’ NATURAL SCIENCE COMPETENCE
Main Article Content
Abstract
Integrated teaching and learning fosters holistic and in-depth knowledge construction among students, simultaneously enhancing their application skills. However, teaching complex concepts such as the human locomotor system, which necessitates the integration of knowledge from various scientific disciplines, often presents significant pedagogical challenges. This paper proposes leveraging the theory of analogy (or analogous reasoning) as an effective pedagogical strategy for implementing integrated teaching of the Locomotor System. The primary objective of this study is to establish a pedagogical process for integrating analogical reasoning into Natural Sciences instruction and to apply this process to the teaching of Locomotor System unit in Grade 8. This involves using mechanical principles (e.g., pressure, the lever system, elasticity) to establish analogies with the musculoskeletal system, thereby facilitating understanding of its structure and function in relation to body movement (e.g., bone rotation around joints, elasticity of muscles and ligaments). Consequently, students not only acquire a profound understanding of the Locomotor System’s structure and operational mechanism, but are also empowered to apply this knowledge to practical activities—such as maintaining proper posture and executing safe movements in sports and daily life—to ensure musculoskeletal safety. This instructional methodology contributes significantly to the comprehensive development of students’ natural science competence.
Keywords
analogous reasoning, integrated teaching, locomotor system, musculoskeletal safety, natural science competence
Article Details
References
Gray, M. E., & Holyoak, K. J. (2021). Teaching by analogy: From theory to practice. Mind, Brain, and Education, 15(3), 250–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12288
Ministry of Education and Training. (2018a). Chương trình giáo dục phổ thông môn Khoa học tự nhiên [General education curriculum: Natural science].
Ministry of Education and Training. (2018b). Chương trình giáo dục phổ thông tổng thể [General education curriculum: Overall program].
Nguyen, D. T., & Nguyen, N. H. (2001). Tổ chức hoạt động nhận thức cho học sinh trong dạy học vật lí ở trường phổ thông [Organizing cognitive activities for students in physics teaching in secondary schools]. Vietnam National University Press.
Sezer, K., & Karatas, F. Ö. (2022). Research trends about analogy studies in science education: A descriptive content analysis. Journal of Science Learning, 5(2), 217–225. https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v5i2.39095
Tran, N. C. (2016). Tương tự trong nghiên cứu và trong dạy học vật lí [Analogy in research and physics teaching]. HNUE Journal of Science: Educational Sciences, 61(8B), 57–67. https://doi.org/10.18173/2354-1075.2016-0159
Veshovda, S., Eik, H., Andersen, M. H., Jahre, H., & Riiser, K. (2023). Health literacy and musculoskeletal disorders in adolescents: A scoping review. BMJ Open, 13(6), e072753. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072753
Wicaksono, A. G., & Rahman, I. H. (2022). Philosophy of integrated natural science learning. Jurnal Pena Sains, 9(2), 20–35. https://doi.org/10.21107/jps.v9i2.16778