Applying the theory of analogy in integrated teaching of the "Locomotor system" unit in natural sciences 8 towards developing students' natural science competence
Main Article Content
Abstract
Integrated teaching and learning fosters holistic and in-depth knowledge construction among students, simultaneously enhancing their practical application skills. However, teaching scientifically complex concepts such as the human locomotor system, which necessitates the integration of knowledge from various scientific disciplines, often presents significant pedagogical challenges. This paper proposes leveraging the theory of analogy (or analogous reasoning) as an effective pedagogical strategy for implementing integrated teaching of the Locomotor System.
The primary objective of this study is to establish a viable process for utilizing analogous reasoning within integrated Natural Sciences instruction, and subsequently applying it to the "Locomotor System" unit. This involves using mechanical principles (e.g., pressure, the lever system, elasticity) to establish analogies with the musculoskeletal system, thereby facilitating understanding of its structure and function in relation to body movement (e.g., bone rotation around joints, elasticity of muscles and ligaments). Consequently, students not only acquire a profound understanding of the Locomotor System's structure and operational mechanism, but are also empowered to apply this knowledge to practical activities—such as maintaining proper posture and executing safe movements in sports and daily life—to ensure musculoskeletal safety. This instructional methodology contributes significantly to the comprehensive development of students' Natural Science competence.
Keywords
Keywords: Integrated teaching, analogous reasoning, locomotor system, natural science competence, Musculoskeletal safety.
Article Details
References
2. Bộ giáo dục và Đào tạo (2018). Chương trình giáo dục phổ thông môn Khoa học tự nhiên
3. Trần Ngọc Chất (2016). Tương tự trong nghiên cứu và trong dạy học vật lí. JOURNAL OF SCIENCE OF HNUE, Educational Sci; Vol. 61, No. 8B, pp. 57-67. DOI: 10.18173/2354-1075.2016-0159
4. Eriksson, S., Gericke, N., & Thörne, K. (2024). Analogy competence for science teachers. Studies in Science Education, 1-29.
5. Gray, M. E., & Holyoak, K. J. (2021). Teaching by analogy: From theory to practice. Mind, Brain, and Education, 15(3), 250-263.
6. Sezer, K., & Karatas, F. Ö. (2022). Research Trends about Analogy Studies in Science Education: A Descriptive Content Analysis. Journal of Science Learning, 5(2), 217-225.
7. Nguyễn Đức Thâm, Nguyễn Ngọc Hưng (2001). Tổ chức hoạt động nhận thức cho học sinh trong dạy học vật lí ở trường phổ thông. NXB Đại học Quốc gia Hà Nội. Tái bản lần thứ 2.
8. Veshovda, S., Eik, H., Andersen, M. H., Jahre, H., & Riiser, K. (2023). Health literacy and musculoskeletal disorders in adolescents: a scoping review. BMJ open, 13(6), e072753.
9. Wicaksono, A. G., & Rahman, I. H. (2022). Philosophy of integrated natural science learning. Jurnal Pena Sains Vol, 9(2), 20-35.