COMMON SOURCE DOMAINS IN BARACK OBAMA’S INAUGURAL SPEECH
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article investigates Barack Obama’s inaugural speech delivered on January 20, 2009, to systematically identify, describe, and analyze several prominent conceptual metaphors grounded in frequently occurring source domains. The Metaphor Identification Procedure by Pragglejaz Group (2007) was adopted as the primary analytical instrument for the identification of conceptual metaphors. The identified metaphors were subsequently described, classified, and interpreted within the theoretical framework of the relationship between thought, language, and culture. The findings demonstrate that the common source domains employed include HUMAN, JOURNEY, BUILDING, WAR, ANIMAL and PLANT, and WEATHER. These findings provide insights into how source domains shape the processes of conceptualization and categorization in political discourse.
Keywords
categorization, conceptual metaphor, conceptualization, inaugural speech, source domain
Article Details
References
Charteris-Black, J. (2004). Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. Palgrave Macmillan.
Goatly, A. (1997). The Language of Metaphors. Routledge.
Goatly, A. (2007). Washing the Brain: Metaphor and Hidden Ideology. John Benjamins Pub-lishing Company.
Kövecses, Z. (2005). Metaphor in Culture: Universality and Variation. Cambridge University Press.
Kövecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor: A Practical Introduction (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980, 2003). Metaphors We Live By. The University of Chicago Press.
Luu, D. P. (2025). Conceptual metaphors in Barack Obama’s 2009 inaugural speech. Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science - Social Sciences, 16(8), 100-112. https://doi.org/10.46223/HCMCOUJS.soci.en.16.8.4791.2026
Moustafa, S., Nagi, S., Fathalla, N., Mohamed, A., & Mohamed, S. (2021). An analysis of the use of metaphor in Barack Obama’s inaugural speech of January 20, 2009. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry (TOJQI), 12(8), 5195-5204.
Nguyen, T. N. N. (2014). Phân tích ẩn dụ trong diễn ngôn chính trị của Mĩ [Analysis of met-aphor in American political discourse]. Journal of Language and Life, 1, 41-47.
Nguyen, T. V. A. (2020). Phân tích diễn ngôn phê phán bài phát biểu nhậm chức của Tổng thống Mĩ Barack Obama năm 2009 [Critical discourse analysis of President Barack Obama’s 2009 inaugural address]. Journal of Lexicography and Encyclopaedia, 3, 148-152.
Nguyen, V. H., & Nguyen, H. A. (Trans.). (2016). Dẫn luận ngôn ngữ học tri nhận [Intro-duction to Cognitive Linguistics]. Hanoi National University Press.
Nguyen, X. H. (2019). Về một số miền nguồn phổ biến trong diễn ngôn chính trị tiếng Anh [About some common source domains in English political discourses]. Ho Chi Minh City University of Education Journal of Science, 16(1), 101-106.
Nguyen, X. H. & Huynh, T. B. P. (2020). Về ánh xạ nguồn – đích trong diễn ngôn chính trị tiếng Anh Mĩ [About source-to-target mappings in American English political dis-course]. Journal of Lexicography and Encyclopaedia, 2(70), 107-114.
Pragglejaz Group (2007). MIP: A Method for Identifying Metaphorically Used Words in Dis-course. METAPHOR AND SYMBOL, 22(1), 1–39.
Pilar, M. G. E. (2011). Barack Obama’s inaugural address: Metaphor and values as captivat-ing strategies to celebrate a presidency. Pragmalinguistica, 19, 44-55.
Risdianto, F. (2016). The use of metaphor in Barack Obama’s inauguration speech. Lan-guage Circle: Journal of Language and Literature, 10(2), 161-172.
Rosch, E. (1973). Natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 328-350.
Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch & B. B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and Categorization (pp.7-48). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Steen, G. J., Dorst, A. G., Herrmann, J. B., Kaal, A. A., & Krennmayr, T. (2010). Metaphor in Usage. Cognitive Linguistics 21-4 (2010), 765-796.
Trinh, S. (2016a). Phổ quát và đặc thù thông qua một số miền ý niệm nguồn [Universality and specificity through some conceptual source domains]. Journal of Language, 10, 23-34.
Trinh, S. (2016b). Ẩn dụ ý niệm và những vấn đề còn lại [Conceptual metaphor and remain-ing issues]. Journal of Language and Life, 12(254), 1-5.
Trinh, S. (2019). Lí thuyết nghiệm thân nhìn từ thực tiễn tiếng Việt [Embodiment theory viewed from Vietnamese linguistic practice]. Journal of Language, 1(356), 24-38.
Urbonaitė, J., & Šeškauskienė, I. (2007). HEALTH metaphor in political and economic dis-course:
A cross-linguistic analysis. Studies About Languages, 11, 68-73.
Żołnowska, I. (2011). Weather as the source domain for metaphorical expressions.
Avant: The Journal of the Philosophical-Interdisciplinary Vanguard, 2(1), 165-179.