Article Sidebar

Issue: Tập 23, Số 8 (2026)
Section: Articles
DOI: 10.54607/hcmue.js.23.8.5508(2026)
Date Published: 27/08/2026
Views 47
How to Cite
Pham, T. D. T., Tong, T. A. T., Bui, H. A. N., Nguyen, T. P. T., Duong, T. L., & Mai, T. H. (2026). FACTORS INFLUENCING MATHEMATICS TEACHER EDUCATION STUDENTS’ SELF - ASSESSMENT OF GEOMETRY TEACHING SKILLS IN A CULTURAL HERITAGE CONTEXT IN VIETNAM. Ho Chi Minh City University of Education Journal of Science, 23(8). https://doi.org/10.54607/hcmue.js.23.8.5508(2026)

FACTORS INFLUENCING MATHEMATICS TEACHER EDUCATION STUDENTS’ SELF - ASSESSMENT OF GEOMETRY TEACHING SKILLS IN A CULTURAL HERITAGE CONTEXT IN VIETNAM

Phạm Thị Diệu Thùy1, , Tong Thi Anh Thu, Bui Hoang Anh Nguyet, Nguyen Phuong Thao, Duong Thi Luyen, Mai Thi Hoi
1 Hanoi Pedagogical University 2, Vietnam

Main Article Content

Abstract

The article aims to identify and analyze factors affecting the self-assessment of teaching skills in geometry integrated with cultural heritage among pre-service mathematics teachers in Vietnam. The study employs a quantitative approach with a sample of 219 students from three universities in Northern Vietnam. Data were collected through a questionnaire consisting of 21 observed variables across three groups of factors: cognition; instructional design competence and the use of heritage-based teaching materials; and the training environment and self-directed professional development. These factors were measured using a five-point Likert scale. The measurement scales were validated using Cronbach’s Alpha, combined with exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and linear regression analysis. The results indicate that the model demonstrates good fit and statistical significance, with instructional design competence and the use of heritage-based teaching materials exerting the strongest influence (β = 0.695; p < 0.001). The study highlights the necessity of adjusting mathematics teacher education curricula and teaching approaches to enhance the effective integration of cultural heritage into mathematics instruction at the secondary school level.

Keywords

influencing factors, self-assessment ability, geometry teaching skills, cultural heritage, mathematics teacher education students

Article Details

References

TÀI LIỆU THAM KHẢO
1. Argyri, P. (2022). Geometry and digital cultural heritage as unique linking for development students’ knowledge, skills and attitudes. International University Learning Research Series, 1(2).
2. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–31.
3. Chevallard, Y. (1985). La transposition didactique. La Pensée Sauvage.
4. Cuenca-López, J. M., Martín-Cáceres, M. J., & Estepa-Giménez, J. (2021). Teacher training in heritage education: Good practices for citizenship education. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications.
5. Duval, R. (2005). The cognitive analysis of problems of comprehension in the learning of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61(1–2), 103–131.
6. Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (2013). The museum experience revisited. Routledge.
7. Fischbein, E. (1993). The theory of figural concepts. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 24(2), 139–162.
8. Fontal, O., & Ibáñez-Etxeberria, A. (2017). La investigación en educación patrimonial: Evolución y estado actual a través del análisis de indicadores de alto impacto. Revista de Educación, 375, 184–214.
9. Gadaza, A. C., Manera, A. B., Santos, S. D., Alih, C. B., Caban, R. M., & Tulawie, A. U. (2025). Reviving the past, teaching the future: The role of Philippine cultural heritage in curriculum development of teacher education programs focus. International Journal on Culture, History, and Religion, 7(SI2), 80–97.
10. Gómez-Carrasco, C. J., Miralles-Martinez, P., Fontal, O., & Ibáñez-Etxeberria, A. (2020). Cultural heritage and methodological approaches: An analysis through initial training of history teachers (Spain–England). Sustainability, 12(3), 933.
11. Hannula, M. S. (2006). Motivation in mathematics: Goals reflected in emotions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63(2), 165–178.
12. Heritage, M., & Wylie, E. C. (2018). Reaping the benefits of assessment for learning. Corwin.
13. Hidayatullah, A., & Csíkos, C. (2023). Exploring students’ mathematical beliefs: Gender, grade, and culture differences. Journal on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science, 16(3), 186–195.
14. Jones, K. (2002). Issues in the teaching and learning of geometry. In L. Haggarty (Ed.), Aspects of teaching secondary mathematics: Perspectives on practice (pp. 121–139). RoutledgeFalmer.
15. Jones, K., & Tzekaki, M. (2016). Research on the teaching and learning of geometry. In A. Gutiérrez, G. Leder, & P. Boero (Eds.), The second handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education (pp. 109–149). Sense Publishers.
16. Julizal, T., Johar, R., & Hizir. (2021). Creative thinking in mathematics: The capacity of vocational school students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1882(1), 012053.
17. Kyeremeh, P., Awuah, F. K., & Dorwu, E. (2023). Integration of ethnomathematics in teaching geometry: A systematic review and bibliometric report. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 16(2), 68–89.
18. Laborde, C., Wang, L., & Cho, S. J. (2015). Teaching and learning geometry. In S. J. Cho (Ed.), Proceedings of the 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education. Springer.
19. López-Mondéjar, L. (2022). Patrimonio arqueológico en las aulas de infantil y primaria. Humanities & International Humanidades Review, 11, 1–9.
20. Mailizar, M., Johar, R., & Lainufar, L. (2021). Designing augmented reality-based teaching resource of three-dimensional geometry. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1882(1), 012057.
21. Malegiannaki, I. A., Daradoumis, T., & Retalis, S. (2020). Teaching cultural heritage through a narrative-based game. Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage, 13(4), Article 27, 1–28.
22. Monteagudo-Fernández, J., Gómez-Carrasco, C. J., & Chaparro-Sainz, Á. (2021). Heritage education and research in museums: Conceptual, intellectual and social structure within a knowledge domain (2000–2019). Sustainability, 13(12), 6667.
23. Morón Monge, M. C., Trabajo, M., & Domínguez, E. (2021). Las concepciones del docente de primaria en formación sobre el ser humano y el medio ambiente desde la educación patrimonial y sus relaciones con la sostenibilidad. Espacios, 42(15).
24. Pintus, R., Pal, K., Yang, Y., Weyrich, T., Gobbetti, E., & Rushmeier, H. (2015). A survey of geometric analysis in cultural heritage. Computer Graphics Forum, 34(1), 4–34.
25. Rojo Robas, V., Madariaga, J. M., & Villarroel, J. D. (2020). Secondary education students’ beliefs about mathematics and their repercussions on motivation. Mathematics, 8(3), 368.
26. Suominen, J., & Sivula, A. (2013). Gaming legacy? Four approaches to the relation between cultural heritage and digital technology. Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage, 6(3).
27. Trabajo-Rite, M., & Cuenca-López, J. M. (2020). Student concepts after a didactic experiment in heritage education. Sustainability, 12(7), Article 3046.
28. UNESCO. (2013). Heritage education for sustainable development. UNESCO.
29. Van Doorsselaere, J. (2021). Connecting sustainable development and heritage education? An analysis of the curriculum reform in Flemish public secondary schools. Sustainability, 13(4), 1857.
30. Wouters, R., Van Lakerveld, J., Gussen-Benthem, I., & Van Dessel, J. (2011). Acquiring key competencies through heritage education. KU Leuven-Limburg / Leiden University.