ANALYZE THE INTERNSHIP SCHEME IN THE UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAM OF FRENCH LANGUAGE – TRANSLATION AND INTERPRETATION IN HO CHI MINH CITY UNIVERSITY OF EDUCATION
Main Article Content
Abstract
With the intention of improving the quality of training of the undergraduate program of French Language – Translation & Interpretation, a group of lecturers working in the Translation-Interpretation Faculty of Ho Chi Minh City University of Education proposed an internship scheme and conducted a study to evaluate its effects. The results analyzed from students’ practicum journals, the data from a questionnaire and interviews show that there is a gap between the model designed by the university and the schools where students were sent to during their practicum. The results also help to describe the profiles of practicum supervisors. The article also provides a detailed list of the activities for students, a comparison table of the resources a student has at the university and those required to perform given tasks. These results provide evidence for the university to review the curriculum to meet the markets.
Keywords
internship, the internship scheme, the undergraduate program of French language, translation and interpretation
Article Details
References
Annoot, E., Bodergat, J-Y & Moazereau, P. (2015). Enseignants-chercheurs et activité de direction de mémoire de recherche à distance: entre obstacles et développement professionnel des enseignants-chercheurs? [Teacher-researchers and virtual research thesis management activity: between obstacles and professional development of teacher-researchers?] Dossier of Educational Sciences, no 34/2015/University and research training, 33-51.
Barbier, J.-M. (1996). Tutorat et fonction tutorale: quelques entrées d'analyse [Tutoring and tutorial function: some analysis inputs]. Special edition: The tutorial function in educational organizations and companies, Research and Training, no22/1996, 7-19.
Baudrit, A. (1999). Tuteur: une place, des fonctions, un métier? [Tutor: A place, functions, a profession]. Paris: PUF.
Baudrit, A. (2000). Note de synthèse: Le tutorat: un enjeu pour une pratique pédagogique devenue objet scientifique? [Briefing note: Tutoring: an issue for an educational practice that has become a scientific object?]. French journal of pedagogy, no132, 125 153.
Baudrit, A. (2014). La relation d’aide dans les organisations. Bruxelles: De Boeck Supérieur.
Bodergat, J.-Y. (2006). L’accompagnement: une posture à cerner [Accompaniment: a posture to be defined]. Chapter 2, Doctoral thesis. University of Caen.
Boru, J.-J. & Fortanier, R. (1998). Trente mots clés pour comprendre le tutorat [Thirty keywords to understand tutoring]. Paris: Citadel.
Bruner, J.S. (1983). Le rôle de l’interaction de tutelle [The role of tutorship interaction]. In Childhood development: know-how, knowing how to speak, Paris: PUF, 261-280.
Geay, A. (2007). L’alternance comme processus de professionnalisation: implications didactiques [Block-release training as a professionalization process: didactic implications]. Permanent education, no172, 27-38.
Kloetzer, L. (2015). L’engagement conjoint dans la pratique comme clef du développement de l’activité des tuteurs [Joint commitment in practice as a key to the development of the activity of tutors]. Psychology of Work and Organizations, no21, 286-305.
Paul, M. (2002). L’accompagnement: une nébuleuse [The accompaniment: a nebula]. Permanent education, no153/2002-4, 43-56.
Quintin, J.-J. (2008). Accompagnement d’une formation asynchrone en groupe restreint: modalités d’intervention et modèles de tutorat [Support for asynchronous training in a small group: intervention methods and tutoring models]. Information and Communication Science and Technology Journal for Education and Training, ATIEF 15.