FEEDBACK TO FEEDFORWARD: THE GAME CHANGER IN ESL/EFL TEACHING
Main Article Content
Abstract
This report focuses on examining how powerful feedforward is when utilized within ESL/EFL teaching environments. In contrast to feedback, which centers much around past achievements, feedforward pays attention to what could be done differently and provides the direction toward realization (Dweck, 2006). According to a recent study, it was suggested that AI could be utilized to increase student learning motivation and self-monitoring by providing students with clear and purposeful developmental guidance, which proved to be effective (Carless & Boud, 2018; Nicol & Macfarlane-Dick, 2006). According to Biggs (2003) and Hyland and Hyland (2006), assessment can build alignment with teaching practices and customize learning processes, such that it becomes critical in language training. However, there are still some areas that need further research, such as learners’ different cultures and new cultural environments. Using technology in delivering feedback may be promising, though it should be researched further (Wang, 2014). These points need to be addressed to help understand how impactful feedforward could be turning it into a breakthrough in English language teaching. The purpose of this review is to provide an in-depth examination and suggest future research paths for enhancing the advantages of feedforward strategies.
Keywords
ESL, EFL, feedforward, feedback
Article Details
References
Bitchener, J. (2012). A reflection on 'the language learning potential' of written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(4), 348-363.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and Classroom Learning. Assessment in Education. Assessment in Education, 5, 7-74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. American Psychological Association.
Butler, Y. G., & Zeng, W. (2014). Young learners’ task-based interaction and feedback in foreign language classrooms. Language Teaching Research, 18(3), 291-309.
Carless, D., & Boud, D. (2018). The development of student feedback literacy: Enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(8), 1315-1325.
Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. Random House.
Evans, C. (2013). Making sense of assessment feedback in higher education. Review of Educational Research, 83(1), 70-120.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112.
Hyland, F., & Hyland, K. (2006). Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues. Cambridge University Press.
Lee, I. (2017). Classroom writing assessment and feedback in L2 school contexts. Springer.
Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199-218.
Pickering, C. M., & Byrne, J. (2014). The benefits of the Systematic Quantitative Literature Review method for PhD candidates and other early career researchers. Higher Education Research & Development, 33(3), 534-548. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2013.841651
Ushioda, E. (2017). The Impact of Global English on Motivation to Learn other Languages: Toward an Ideal Multilingual Self. The Modern Language Journal, 101, 469-482. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12413
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press.
Wang, T. H. (2014). Implementation of web-based dynamic assessment in facilitating junior high school students to learn mathematics. Computers & Education, 78, 35-49.
Xu, Y. (2020). Exploring Chinese EFL learners' perceptions of feedforward. Journal of Asia TEFL, 17(1), 150-168.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64-70.