DEVELOPING A MULTIPLE-CHOICE QUESTION BANK TO ASSESS LEARNING OUTCOMES FOR THE COURSE ‘FOUNDATIONS OF MATHEMATICS IN ELEMENTARY EDUCATION 1’ AT HO CHI MINH CITY UNIVERSITY OF EDUCATION

Nguyen Viet Khoa1, , Phan Le1
1 Ho Chi Minh City University of Education

Main Article Content

Abstract

Assessing student learning outcomes is a crucial component of university education, playing a vital role in ensuring and enhancing educational quality. This research focuses on developing a multiple-choice question (MCQ) bank for the course ‘Foundations of Mathematics in Elementary Education 1’ to support student assessment. The study employs a mixed-methods approach, combining qualitative and quantitative methods, and draws upon theoretical foundations of test construction and MCQ design. The question bank development follows a rigorous, five-step scientific process. A total of 300 multiple-choice questions were initially developed, of which 30 were piloted on a sample of 140 students. The pilot results confirmed the feasibility and initial effectiveness of the question bank, while also highlighting areas for improvement. Specifically, 13.3% of the items were classified as difficult, 23.3% as moderate, and 63.3% as easy, based on item difficulty indices. The overall test difficulty was 0.7113—slightly above the optimal range (0.555-0.695)—indicating the test was relatively easy for the target group. These results suggest a need to adjust the distribution of item difficulty, particularly by increasing the proportion of moderate and difficult questions, improving content clarity, and broadening the sample in future pilots. Such adjustments aim to enhance the test’s discriminatory capacity, reliability, and alignment with course learning outcomes.

Article Details

Author Biography

Nguyen Viet Khoa, Ho Chi Minh City University of Education

Phó Trưởng khoa GDTH

References

Bailey, P. H., Mossey, S., Moroso, S., Cloutier, J. D., & Love, A. (2012). Implications of multiple-choice testing in nursing education. Nurse Education today, 32(6), e40-e44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2011.09.011
Central Executive Committee. (2013). Nghi quyet so 29-NQ /TW ngay 04/11/2013 ve Doi moi can ban, toan dien giao duc va dao tao, dap ung yeu cau cong nghiep haa, hien dai hoa trong dieu kien kinh te thi truong dinh huong xa hoi chu nghia va hoi nhap quoc te. [Central Executive Committee. (2013). Resolution No. 29-NQ/TW dated November 4, 2013, on the Fundamental and Comprehensive Renovation of Education and Training to Meet the Requirements of Industrialization and Modernization in the Context of a Socialist-Oriented Market Economy and International Integration].
DiBattista, D., & Kurzawa, L. (2011). Examination of the quality of multiple-choice items on classroom tests. Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 2(2),
Article 4. https://doi.org/10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2011.2.4
Dang, A. H, Nguyen, T. T. A., Nguyen, D.T., & Nguyen. T. K. (2024). Thu nghiem cau hoi trac nghiem khach quan cho hoc phan giao duc hoc tai Truong Dai hoc Su pham Thanh pho
Ho Chi Minh. [Multiple-choice question test bank for a course in Ho Chi Minh City University of Education]. Ho Chi Minh City University of Education Journal of Science, 21(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.54607/hcmue.js.21.1.4017(2024)
Dang, B. L. (2003). Kiem tra đánh gia trong day - hoc dai hoc [Assessment in University Teaching and Learning]. Education Publishing House.
Duong, T. T. (2005). Trac nghiem va do luong thanh qua hoc tap (Phuong phap thuc hanh) [Multiple-choices and measurement of learning outcomes (Practical method)]. Social Science Publishing House.
Faniyi, A. O. (2023). Enhancing student academic performance through educational testing and measurement. Edumania-An International Multidisciplinary Journal, 1(2), 162-171. https://doi.org/10.59231/edumania/8981
Ho, V. L., Tran, T. H., Nguyen, D. D., & Nguyen, T. T. H. (2013). Quy trinh xay dung bo cau hoi trac nghiem kien thuc hoc phan giao duc hoc dai cuong theo chuong trinh dao tao tin chi o Truong Dai hoc Su pham Thanh pho Ho Chi Minh. [The process of building multiple-choices questions package of Education Foundation Course in credit curriculum at Ho Chi Minh Univerisity of Education]. Ho Chi Minh City University of Education Journal of Science, 45, 51-61. https://journal.hcmue.edu.vn/index.php/hcmuejos/article/view/1872
Ho Chi Minh City Universty of Education. (2024). De cuong chi tiet hoc phan co so toan o
tieu hoc 1 [Fundamental mathematics for elementary teachers 1].
Hoang, P. (2008). Tu dien tieng Viet [Vietnamese Dictionary]. Da Nang Publishing House.
Iñarrairaegui, M., Fernández-Ros, N., Lucena, F., Landecho, M. F., García, N., Quiroga, J., & Herrero, J. I. (2022). Evaluation of the quality of multiple-choice questions according to the students’ academic level. BMC Medical Education, 22(1), Article 779.
Jia, B., He, D., & Zhu, Z. (2020). Quality and Feature of Multiple-Choice Questions
in Education. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 78 (4), 576-594. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/20.78.576
Lam, Q. T. (2008). Trac nghiem va ung dung [Tests and Applications]. Science and Technology Publishing House.
Liu, Q., Wald, N., Daskon, C., & Harland, T. (2023). Multiple-choice questions (MCQs) for higher-order cognition: Perspectives of university teachers. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(4), 802-814. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2222715
Ministry of Education and Training. (2021a). Thong tu so 17/2021/TT-BGDĐT ngay 26/6/2021 Quy dinh ve chuan chuong trinh dao tao, xay dung, tham dinh va ban hanh chuong trinh dao tao các trinh do cua giao duc dai hoc [Circular No. 17/2021/TT-BGDĐT
dated June 22, 2021, on regulations for program standards, development, appraisal, and issuance of training programs at higher education levels]. https://vanban.chinhphu.vn/?pageid=27160&docid=203478
Ministry of Education and Training. (2021b). Thong tu so 08/2021/TT-BGDDT Ban hanh Quy che dao tao trinh do dai hoc [Circular No. 08/2021/TT-BGDĐT Promulgating the Regulation on University Education]. https://vanban.chinhphu.vn/default.aspx?pageid=27160&docid=203159
Tran, T. C. T., & Ngo, V. L. (2024). Mot so khuyen nghi xay dung de thi trac nghiem
dap ung chuan dau ra hoc phan tren co so thang đo BLOOM.
[Some recommendations for building multiple-choice tests that meet course outcome standards on the basis of BLOOM scale]. Economy-Industry Journal, (39), 78-83. https://tcktcn.daihoclongan.edu.vn/index.php/ktcn/article/view/142
Tran, T. T. O. (2007). Danh gia va do luong ket qua hoc tap [Assessment and Measurement of Learning Outcomes]. University of Education Publishing House.
Vo, T. H. T., Tran, T. H., Nguyen, K. T., & Hoang, V. M. (2013). Xay dung bo cau hoi trac nghiem kien thuc hoc phan giao duc hoc pho thong theo chuong trinh dao tao tin chi o Truong
Dai hoc Su pham Ho Chi Minh [Building multiple-choices questions package for
General Education in credit curriculum Ho Chi Minh Univerisity of Education].
Ho Chi Minh City University of Education Journal of Science, 48, 114-123. https://journal.hcmue.edu.vn/index.php/hcmuejos/article/view/1915